Heavy Lifting - thoughts and web finds by an economist
|I also contribute to Division of Labour||Load HL's Front Page|
Monday, October 06, 2008
Cost-benefit analysis suggests that one should compare the total costs of a project to the total benefits of the project. If the costs outweigh the benefits, the prescription is generally one of caution.
Bud Selig, commissioner of MLB, offers his own version of cost-benefit analysis:
"Every time I drive by the stadium I’m reminded of much that went on," Selig said. "But as my mother would have said, thank goodness for small favors: All the politicians that fought it are either gone or don’t say anything. That’s a good thing. It’s a wonderful day for Milwaukee."So, if benefits are positive then the project is a no-brainer? This sounds a little self-serving on the part of the commish.
There was a similar approach in Arlington, TX, in the run-up to the 2004 vote for the Cowboys stadium. There was an economic benefit study that did not discuss word one about the costs.
A substantial protion of Arlington's contribution to the stadium project was just reset from 2% to 10% on auction rate bonds. Didn't see that cost coming, I suppose.
Comments: Post a Comment
Le Chai - galerie du vin
Posts that contain Craig Depken per day for the last 90 days.
Heavy Lifting's Main Page
Money I Found Today
Heavy Lifting - Firehose style (56k warning)
- Weird cost-benefit analysis
Modified maystar design
powered by blogger