Heavy Lifting - thoughts and web finds by an economist
|I also contribute to Division of Labour||Load HL's Front Page|
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
In the absence of secure property rights in a foreign country, foreign direct investment is lower?
From the Energy Information Service's country brief on Bolivia:
In May 2006, President Evo Morales embarked on a campaign of resource nationalism, including the re-nationalization of all hydrocarbon resources and the renegotiation of export contracts with Argentina and Brazil. The impact of this campaign remains unclear: in the short-term, Bolivia has been able to secure higher prices for its natural gas exports, but foreign investment has been slow to recover to its former levels.
The re-nationalization, i.e., expropriation of private property for the so-called common or public good, is the antithesis to secure property rights. Is it any wonder that private investment in natural gas extraction or other carbon industries is considerably lower after the nationalization program was initiated?
Sure. The best defense against theft is to not own things in danger of being stolen.Post a Comment
It would seem that imminent domain has a similar but lesser effect.
Le Chai - galerie du vin
Posts that contain Craig Depken per day for the last 90 days.
Heavy Lifting's Main Page
Money I Found Today
Heavy Lifting - Firehose style (56k warning)
- Who knew?
Modified maystar design
powered by blogger